Senate Bill No. 99
(By Senators Anderson, Deem, Buckalew, Ross, Sprouse, Scott and
Sharpe)
__________
[Introduced February 21, 1997:
referred to the Committee on Natural Resources; and then to the
Committee on the Judiciary.]
__________
A BILL to amend the code of West Virginia, one thousand nine hundred
thirty-one, as amended, by adding thereto a new chapter, designated
chapter twenty-two-d; and to amend and reenact section two, article
five, chapter twenty-nine-a of said code; all relating to creating
a privilege from admissibility of evidence in administrative, civil
and criminal actions for self evaluations of facility compliance
with environmental laws; providing definitions; creating a
privilege for performing environmental audits and preparing
environmental audit reports; providing waivers and exceptions to
the privilege; establishing procedures to overcome the privilege;
limiting disclosure of audit report; requiring certain actions to
maintain the privilege; establishing wavier of civil penalties in
certain circumstances; maintaining existing privileges;
establishing burden of proof necessary to overcome the privilege; establishing appeal procedures; limiting waiver of the privilege;
and providing protection of audit documents submitted to a
governmental agency.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
That the code of West Virginia, one thousand nine hundred thirty- one, as amended, be amended by adding thereto a new chapter,
designated chapter twenty-two-d; and that section two, article five,
chapter twenty-nine-a of said code be amended and reenacted, all to
read as follows:
CHAPTER 22D. ENVIRONMENTAL SELF AUDITS.
ARTICLE 1. ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITS PRIVILEGE
§22D-1-1. Legislative intent.
The Legislature hereby finds and declares that protection of the
environment and human health is enhanced by encouraging voluntary
compliance with environmental laws and that the public and the
environment will benefit from incentives to encourage businesses to
identify and remedy environmental law noncompliance; that self
evaluation and voluntary compliance by businesses independent of
governmental enforcement actions promote cleanup of existing pollution
and prevent future pollution; that providing protection from forced
disclosure of environmental self-evaluations for businesses who
undertake timely remediations of discovered violations, combined with
a waiver of certain civil penalties for timely self-reporting, will
create incentives for businesses to aggressively evaluate activities
which impact the environment to undertake any necessary remediation activities, thereby improving the quality of the state's environment.
§22D-1-2. Definitions.
Unless the context in which used clearly requires a different
meaning, as used in the article:
(a) "Division" means the West Virginia division of environmental
protection as established in chapter twenty-two of this code.
(b) "Environmental audit" means a voluntary, good faith and
comprehensive evaluation of a facility or facilities or any part
thereof, including specific activities, processes or management
systems, or local counterparts or extensions thereof, or management
systems related to a facility or activity, that is designed to
identify and prevent incidents of noncompliance and to promote future
compliance with environmental laws. An environmental audit may be
conducted by the owner or operator of a facility, by the employees of
the owner or operator, or by outside consultants or agents retained
by the owner or operator for purposes of performing such an audit.
(c) "Environmental audit report" means a set of documents
prepared as a result of an environmental audit, including, but not
limited to, sampling results, test results, field notes and records
of observations, findings, suggestions, conclusions, drafts,
memoranda, drawings, photographs, computer-generated or electronically
recorded information, maps, charts, graphs, surveys, provided that the
information is collected or developed in the course of conducting an
environmental audit. An environmental audit report may include, but
is not limited to, the following: (1) Scope and date of the audit and the information gained in the audit together with exhibits and
appendices, and may include conclusions and recommendations; (2)
memoranda and documents analyzing part or all of the audit report and
discussing implementation issues; and (3) an audit implementation plan
that addresses correcting past noncompliance, improving current
compliance and preventing future noncompliance. The environmental
audit report includes any memorandum, information, communications or
documents discussing all or part of other environmental audit or
implementation of compliance plans. Each document contained in the
report must be labeled "Environmental Audit Report: Privileged
Document" to be designated as part of the environmental audit report.
(d) "Environmental law" means any federal, state or local
statute, law, ordinance, rule or regulation or permit standard
applicable to a facility or the operations of a facility designed to
protect or enhance the land, air or water for the protection of human
health, natural resources or the environment.
(e) "Facility" means any site, operation or activity that is
subject to regulation under any environmental law or laws.
(f) "Pattern of negligent acts" means: (i) Two or more negligent
acts occurring within a two year time period, each of which causes
harm to human health; or (ii) when negligence acts causes harm to the
environment, a pattern is shown when three or more negligent acts
occur within a two year time period. For purposes of establishing a
pattern of negligent acts, negligent acts occurring prior to the
effective date of this Act, and acts that are not related by similar cause or similar type of harm shall not be considered. For the
purposes of establishing a pattern of negligent acts, a violation of
a environmental law does not constitute a per se negligent act. For
any act to be considered in a pattern of negligent acts, the person
asserting the allegation of a pattern of negligent acts must
demonstrate in an in camera or confidential review, as provided in
section four of this article, that the acts violated the standard of
reasonable care of the person asserting the privilege, and the pattern
of negligent acts directly caused actual harm to human health or the
environment.
§22D-1-3. Privilege created, inadmissibility as evidence in any
proceeding.
(a) In order to encourage owners and operators of facilities to
conduct voluntary environmental self-evaluations of their operations
to assess and improve compliance with statutory and regulatory
requirements under environmental law, an environmental audit privilege
is hereby created to protect the confidentiality of communications
relating to any such environmental audit. An environmental audit
report and any materials created in its development shall be
privileged and shall not be admissible as evidence in any civil,
criminal or administrative proceeding, and shall be exempt from
disclosure or discovery in connection with or in anticipation of any
such proceeding, except as provided in section four of this article.
(b) If the privilege described in this section is applicable to
an environmental audit, the owner or operator, the employees of the owner or operator, or outside consultants or agents who engage in the
performance of an environmental audit may not be examined in any
civil, criminal or administrative proceeding as to the content of the
audit or any environmental audit report without the consent of the
owner or operator of the affected facility.
§22D-1-4. Privilege requirements and applicability.
(a) The privilege is applicable if the owner or operator has met
all the following requirements:
(1) If the owner or operator has failed to apply for any permit
required by an environmental law, an application for the permit must
be filed no later than sixty days after the date on which the owner
or operator becomes aware of the need for the permit.
(2) For other violations of environmental laws identified in an
environmental audit that do not require application for a permit, the
following requirements must be met:
(A) A preliminary plan for achievement of compliance must be
prepared within sixty days of completion of the environmental audit.
This plan shall include identification of the elements and course of
action necessary to be taken to bring the facility into compliance
with environmental laws, and identification of any action that needs
to be taken immediately to minimize any adverse effect of
noncompliance.
(B) Within six months, a final plan must be completed which
establishes a reasonable time-frame for remediation, along with a
specific engineering plan for all necessary acts required to bring the owner or operator into compliance with all state and federal laws.
The final plan must include an assessment of each environmental law
violation and goals and plans to prevent future noncompliance.
(b) The environmental audit privilege established in section
three of this article does not apply or may be revoked under any of
the following conditions:
(1) The privilege is expressly waived by the owner or operator
of the facility that is the subject of the environmental audit;
(2) The owner or operator of the facility that is the subject of
the environmental audit seeks to introduce the environmental audit
report as evidence in any civil, criminal or administrative hearing;
(3) After an in camera or confidential review consistent with all
applicable rules of a court or administrative body, and upon a finding
by a court or administrative body that:
(A) The privilege is asserted for a fraudulent purpose;
(B) The material is not subject to the privilege; or
(C) Even if subject to the privilege, the material or other
evidence demonstrates that prior to the audit, the owner or operator
has through either a pattern of negligent acts, or by any act of gross
negligence, or any intentional act, violated an environmental law,
resulting in actual harm to human health or the environment. Actual
harm must be demonstrated by bona fide medical, environmental, or
financial evidence.
(4) In a criminal proceeding, a court of record after an in
camera review, may require disclosure of material for which the privilege is asserted, upon the finding of the court that the material
contains evidence relevant to commission of an offense, and the
government has substantial and compelling need for the information,
and the information cannot be obtained from other independent sources.
(5) If the person claiming the privilege fails to prepare a
preliminary plan or a final plan and complete remediation as required
by subsection (a) of section four of this article.
(c) The privilege described in section three of this article also
does not apply to any of the following types of information:
(1) Information that is subject to reporting or availability
requirements under existing permits or environmental laws;
(2) Information obtained by a regulatory agency through its own
observation, sampling or monitoring, or from any source independent
of the environmental audit report; or
(3) Information obtained from a source independent of the
environmental audit.
§22D-1-5. Limitation on civil penalties.
If an owner or operator of a facility regulated under this
article complies with all the requirements of this article, the
division shall not seek civil penalties for any self reported
violation reported in a permit application or otherwise reported,
which is discovered as a result of an environmental audit. This waiver
of civil penalties shall not apply if the division has assumed primacy
over a federally delegated environmental law and this waiver of
penalty authority would result in a state program being less stringent than the federal program or the waiver would violate any federal
regulation required to maintain state primacy. If a federally
delegated program requires the imposition of a penalty for a
violation, the voluntary disclosure of the violation shall be, to the
extent allowed under federal law or regulation, considered a
mitigating factor in determining the penalty amount.
§22D-1-6. Burden of proof.
A party seeking forced disclosure or any information in an
environmental audit report has the burden of proving the existence of
conditions making the privilege under section three of this article
inapplicable. To release audit materials, the court or administrative
body must find clear and convincing evidence that a violation of
section four of this article has occurred.
§22D-1-7. Disclosure of audit materials.
If any of the information contained in an environmental audit
report or obtained during the course of an environmental audit is
subject to disclosure under this article, only those portions of the
environmental audit report relevant to the applicable proceedings and
subject to section four of this article shall be disclosed. Provided,
That when the privilege has been asserted for any fraudulent purpose,
all portions of the audit shall be subject to disclosure.
§22D-1-8. Disclosure of audit materials subject to appeal.
No portion of the audit shall be released until the person or
persons asserting the audit privilege have been provided an
opportunity to appeal the disclosure. For administrative hearings, the appeal shall be initiated pursuant to the state administrative
procedures act, as provided in section four, article five of chapter
twenty-nine-a of the code. Any circuit court decision to release audit
materials may be appealed pursuant to the rules of the West Virginia
Supreme Court of Appeals for civil procedure for trial courts of
record.
§22D-1-9. Existing privileges retained.
Nothing in this article shall limit, waive or abrogate the scope
or nature of any other statutory or common law privileges, including,
but not limited to, the work product doctrine and the attorney-client
privilege.
§22D-1-10. Confidential submission does not waive privilege.
An owner or operator may submit an environmental audit report or
a portion thereof to a governmental agency as a confidential document
without waiving a privilege to which the owner or operator would
otherwise be entitled under this article, including protection from
disclosure pursuant to chapter twenty-nine-b of this code.
CHAPTER 29A. STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT.
ARTICLE 5. CONTESTED CASES.
§29A-5-2. Rules of evidence; taking notice of facts; correction
of
transcript.
(a) In contested cases irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly
repetitious evidence shall be excluded. The rules of evidence as
applied in civil cases in the circuit courts of this state shall be followed. When necessary to ascertain facts not reasonably
susceptible of proof under those rules, evidence not admissible
thereunder may be admitted, except where precluded by statute, if it
is of a type commonly relied upon by reasonably prudent men in the
conduct of their affairs. Agencies shall be bound by the rules of
privilege recognized by law, including those set forth in article one,
chapter twenty-two-d of this code. Objections to evidentiary offers
shall be noted in the record. Any party to any such hearing may vouch
the record as to any excluded testimony or other evidence.
(b) All evidence, including papers, records, agency staff
memoranda and documents in the possession of the agency, of which it
desires to avail itself, shall be offered and made a part of the
record in the case, and no other factual information or evidence shall
be considered in the determination of the case. Documentary evidence
may be received in the form of copies or excerpts or by incorporation
by reference.
(c) Every party shall have the right of cross-examination of
witnesses who testify, and shall have the right to submit rebuttal
evidence.
(d) Agencies may take notice of judicially cognizable facts. All
parties shall be notified either before or during hearing, or by
reference in preliminary reports or otherwise, of the material so
noticed, and they shall be afforded an opportunity to contest the
facts so noticed.
(e) Upon motion in writing served by any party as notice may be served pursuant to section two, article seven of this chapter and
therein assigning error or omission in any part of any transcript of
the proceedings had and testimony taken at any such hearing, the
agency shall settle all differences arising as to whether such
transcript truly discloses what occurred at the hearing and shall
direct that the transcript be corrected and revised in the respects
designated by the agency, so as to make it conform to the whole truth.
NOTE: The purpose of this bill is to establish an environmental
audit privilege for businesses which conduct self audits to assess
environmental law compliance. As long as the privilege attaches to
audit documents, the audit cannot be used in a legal proceeding as
evidence against the business. Requirements to obtain and maintain
the privilege are also established.
Strike-throughs to current law indicate language that would be
stricken from the present law and underscoring indicates new language
that would be added. Chapter 22D is new; therefore strike-throughs
and underscoring have been omitted.